2012 Olympics costs shoot up �5m in three months
THE cost of staging the 2012 Olympics has gone up another �5m in just three months, according to latest estimates. It means cutting corners and only putting up what’s needed in the athletes’ village for the two-week Games
THE cost of staging the 2012 Olympics in East London has gone up another �5 million in just three months, according to latest estimates out today.
It means cutting corners and only putting up what's needed in the athletes' village for the two-week Games.
The anticipated final bill for the whole 'super project' is now put at �7.267 billion, the Olympic authority's quarterly Economic Report shows.
This is an increase of 0.1 per cent since the last quarterly report, but well within the �8.1bn margin available, the authority points out.
Around �130m savings have been achieved since February, or �600m since the budget was agreed in 2007.
You may also want to watch:
"But we are not complacent," the Olympics Authority Chairman John Armitt insists. "There is still a lot of work ahead. The next 12 months is set to be our busiest yet, with 10,000 workers on the Olympic Park and Village sites."
Potential cost increases are forecast in transport and infrastructure for the Village and Stratford City developments, however.
- 1 Fire breaks out in flat near New Providence Wharf tower block
- 2 Groomed girl speaks out after 'dangerous' Barking dealer who dealt Class A drugs in East End is jailed
- 3 Dog festival gets go-ahead for Isle of Dogs, of all places
- 4 Ex-police officer among group jailed for £850k intercept from rival gangs
- 5 Trains being tested on Crossrail's Elizabeth line up to four an hour
- 6 Pedestrian struck by motorcycle in critical condition following Stepney collision
- 7 'Stop building more towers,' MP at protest after New Providence Wharf fire
- 8 Battle lost to save historic Whitechapel bell foundry
- 9 South Africa and Indian Covid variants found in Shoreditch and Dalston
- 10 Kenny Jackett emerges as odds-on favourite for Leyton Orient job
The decision to build only what is needed in the athletes' village for the Games means there will be spare land for future residential development after 2012, which should claw back some of the costs.