Council leader defends six-figure pay out to former Tower Hamlets chief executive
THE council leader insists the Town Hall was mindful of tax payers money, despite criticism from an independent watchdog over its handling of the departure of its former chief executive. In an Audit commission report district auditor Jon Hayes criticis
THE council leader insists the Town Hall was "mindful" of tax payers' money, despite criticism from an independent watchdog over its handling of the departure of its former chief executive.
In an Audit commission report district auditor Jon Hayes criticised Tower Hamlets for not considering ways of lessening the cost to the public purse of the termination of Martin Smith's employment.
Mr Smith called in his union following a meeting with council leader Lutfur Rahman, and following negotiations received a settlement of over �300,000.
Cllr Rahman said: "In reaching a settlement with Mr Smith, the council followed all established national procedures and was, of course, mindful of the prudent use of taxpayers' money.
You may also want to watch:
"We nonetheless welcome the Audit Commission's constructive comments and are always happy to revisit our procedures to see if any improvements are possible."
Mr Hayes criticised the council for not taking legal and financial advice earlier,
- 1 Two in five people in Tower Hamlets may have had Covid-19
- 2 Teenager found dead in Victoria Park
- 3 'Laptop bonanza' for schoolchildren in Poplar to help survive lockdown gloom
- 4 Students in rent strike over Queen Mary's campus staying open during Covid emergency
- 5 Post deliveries in east London hit by Covid crisis among Royal Mail staff
- 6 500 deaf children wait to see if their education needs will be cut by Tower Hamlets Council
- 7 Lockdown dancing in your own living room goes online from Canary Wharf
- 8 Tower of London's Queen raven feared dead
- 9 That's so raven: Everything you need to know about the guardians of the Tower
- 10 Hunt for bogus health worker who gave fake Covid jab to woman of 92
and concluded that as a result the council may have incurred costs in reaching an agreement with the former chief executive that could have been avoided.