Muslim cop who quits over MI5 ‘terrorist camp’ warning sues police
A Muslim police officer in London’s East End who quit after being caught up in national security legislation concerning terrorist training camps abroad is suing the Met Police for race discrimination and employment equality.
Abdul Rahman, 33, had been an officer in Tower Hamlets for three years until he resigned in 2006.
His legal team confirmed this week that his resignation followed the withdrawal of his security clearance to use the police national databank.
The law firm, Russell Jones & Walker, believe the move followed an MI5 warning that he might have visited a terrorist training camp in Pakistan 11 years ago.
Mr Rahman, who was born in Bangladesh but grew up in Poplar in east London, did visit Pakistan in 2001—but vehemently denies ever going to a terror training camp.
You may also want to watch:
He resigned after losing an internal appeal against withdrawal of his security clearance, rather than face dismissal.
Now, six years on, he is taking the Met to an employment tribunal after the Police Federation took up his case.
- 1 Leyton Orient confident next manager will take them to the next level
- 2 Leyton Orient reportedly down to final three candidates
- 3 Man, 20, found fighting for life at illegal rave in Bow
- 4 Indian variant of Covid-19 - what's the situation in London?
- 5 South Africa and Indian Covid variants found in Shoreditch and Dalston
- 6 Fire breaks out in flat near New Providence Wharf tower block
- 7 Covid-19 mass testing after variant detected in E1 postal area
- 8 Ex-police officer among group jailed for £850k intercept from rival gangs
- 9 Groomed girl speaks out after 'dangerous' Barking dealer who dealt Class A drugs in East End is jailed
- 10 Dog festival gets go-ahead for Isle of Dogs, of all places
“He has never been questioned, arrested or charged under any terrorism legislation,” his lawyer Jasmine van Loggerenberg said in a statement to the Advertiser.
“This case centres on ensuring questions of national security do not override natural justice.
“It is about balancing the need to protect national security and the need to protect innocent individuals from becoming tangled up in legislation which can have unjust impact on the tribunal process.”
The 2006 anti-terrorism legislation means an individual and even their lawyer can be barred from parts or all of the tribunal “for national security” and even from information which could be vital to their case.
The lawyer added: “This case also raises issues about whether practices which disadvantage innocent people on the basis of ethnic or religious background can ever be justified.”
MI5 carried out routine security vetting in 2006 for Scotland Yard which led to Pc Rahman’s security clearance being withdrawn—which effectively made him unemployable as a cop.
He was never arrested or even questioned under the 2006 Terrorism Act, the lawyer stressed.
Scotland Yard said in a statement this week that the former officer was bringing two employment claims against the Met, alleging race discrimination and employment equality, under religion or belief regulations. The hearing has not yet been listed.