Trial of Lutfur Rahman’s re-election as Tower Hamlets mayor opens in High Court
Embattled... Mayor Lutfur Rahman - Credit: Archant
A trial challenging Lutfur Rahman’s re-election as Mayor of Tower Hamlets is beginning this-morning in the High Court.
The election hearing is expected to last four months, following a petition by campaigners protesting at the way the campaign was carried out that gave Mayor Rahman victory at the polls.
The petition was lodged under the 1983 Representation of the People Act following allegations of “malpractice” and “intimidation at voting stations”.
Four voters filed the petition seeking to get the May 22 election overturned and declared void.
The petition accuses Mayor Rahman’s followers of “casting votes in the name of people not entitled to vote and acquiring voting papers and casting them fraudulently”.
You may also want to watch:
It was lodged by Andy Erlam, who stood in the separate council election the same day on an anti-corruption ticket, and three other activists, Debbie Simone, Azmal Hussein and Angela Moffat.
The writ also names the Town Hall’s returning officer John Williams, claiming he “permitted party agents to enter polling stations unlawfully and leave campaign materials in polling booths”.
Most Read
- 1 Tribute to 7th Barts Health Trust worker to die of Covid-19
- 2 Airbnb house party violence leaves police officer with broken finger
- 3 Teenager found dead in Victoria Park
- 4 Drug and alcohol abuse by Tower Hamlets parents and children soars
- 5 Driver arrested after police 'drugs patrol' stops car in Whitechapel
- 6 'We need laptops for lockdown children to learn from home’ Tower Hamlets mayor urges
- 7 Disgraceful management of the pandemic
- 8 Two in five people in Tower Hamlets may have had Covid-19
- 9 Have you seen this 52-year-old man missing from Ilford?
Election Commissioner QC Richard Mawrey issued an order in December for the Petition trial to be started today at 10am in Court 38 of the Royal Courts of Justice in The Strand, and not in Tower Hamlets itself. The High Court ruled that it should be held “in neutral grounds”.