Search

George Green’s head slams exam regulator Ofqual over GCSE results

PUBLISHED: 15:25 06 November 2012

Head teacher at George Green's School, on the Isle of Dogs, Kenny Frederick has hit at the government over its new schools-comparison website.

Head teacher at George Green's School, on the Isle of Dogs, Kenny Frederick has hit at the government over its new schools-comparison website.

submitted

Exams regulator Ofqual has been slammed by a Tower Hamlets head teacher following the fiasco over this year’s GCSE English grades.

Kenny Frederick, head of George Green’s School on the Isle of Dogs, has written an open letter to Ofqual accusing it of incompetence after thousands of pupils were left with D grades instead of the C grades they expected in English exams.

The controversy began after Ofqual changed the grade boundaries before pupils sat the exam. The changes left many teachers and pupils furious at the regulator, which cites “over-marking” as the cause of the problems.

“George Green’s School has no confidence in the work that Ofqual is doing”, writes Ms Frederick.

“In my opinion Ofqual is poorly led and seems unwilling and unable to accept responsibility for its own mistakes. To put the blame on teachers is intolerable.”

Ms Frederick is now calling on Ofqual to publish exam board reports to back up claims that marking is to blame for the problems facing pupils.

“Good leaders take responsibility for their own mistakes and do not use others as scapegoats”, she added.

George Green’s had 19 pupils who missed out on their projected C grades, despite consistent improvements in exam results in recent years.

It has now joined forces with other schools and local authorities – including Tower Hamlets – to challenge Ofqual to re-grade affected papers.

However, the regulator stands by the findings in its report. A spokesperson said: “Our report recognises the pressures that schools and teachers are under.

“Nowhere does the report say, and nor would we want to suggest, that all schools were over-marking.

“But the over-marking was significant enough to make awarding difficult, and to contribute to the unexpected results we saw.”


If you value what this story gives you, please consider supporting the East London Advertiser. Click the link in the orange box below for details.

Become a supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years, through good times and bad, serving as your advocate and trusted source of local information. Our industry is facing testing times, which is why I’m asking for your support. Every single contribution will help us continue to produce award-winning local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Thank you.

Most Read

Most Read

Latest from the East London Advertiser