Historian Don Rumbelow challenges Jack the Ripper DNA link to Kosminski

PUBLISHED: 11:03 10 September 2014 | UPDATED: 11:16 10 September 2014

Discovering Eddowes' body in Mitre Square, September 30, 1888... and (inset) historian Don Rumbelow

Discovering Eddowes' body in Mitre Square, September 30, 1888... and (inset) historian Don Rumbelow


A new claim this week that DNA has finally identified Jack the Ripper 126 years after the Whitechapel Murders has been challenged by a leading historian.

Catherine Eddowes... Ripper's 4th known victimCatherine Eddowes... Ripper's 4th known victim

Donald Rumbelow, author of several works on the Victorian serial killer who gouged the bodies of at least five prostitutes murdered in 1888, claims the time elapse is too long for the DNA to be accurate.

“There’s no weight in the DNA theory,” Rumbelow told the East London Advertiser. “The sample is taken from the shawl alleged to have belonged to Catherine Eddowes, one of the victims.

“But it was never on the detailed two-page list of her belongings found at the murder scene. There was never any mention of a shawl among the items.”

The DNA is said to match a descendant of one of the seven main suspects, a deranged 25-year-old Polish immigrant named Aaron Kosminski who lived in Whitechapel at the time, identified in a new book by historical sleuth Russell Edwards who bought the shawl seven years ago.

Mitre Square todayMitre Square today

Edwards claims semen stains on the shawl gave a DNA match to Kosminski’s descendant who he traced.

The shawl was said to have been kept as a gruesome souvenir by a constable at the scene in Mitre Square, Aldgate, on the night of September 30, 1888, and handed down through his descendants.

But the constable didn’t belong to the City of London Police. He was a Metropolitan Police officer stationed in Islington—five miles from Mitre Square, historian Rumbelow points out.

It was likely to have been handled by too many people down the years, including enthusiasts at a two-day Ripper convention held in Mile End last year where it was said to have been on display.

“The shawl would be heavily contaminated,” he added. “I don’t believe the shawl genuinely came from Eddowes.

“There is a problem of provenance about the chronology of the ownership or location of the shawl over the last 126 years.”

Catherine Eddowes, a 46-year-old prostitute living in Flower & Dean Street off Brick Lane, half-a-mile from where she was murdered, was one of two women butchered that night.

The latest theory about the killer is one of 100 that have emerged over the past century-and-a-quarter since the Whitechapel Murders which have named Kominski among a long line of suspects that have included American author Lewis Carroll—and even the Prince of Wales, long since discredited.

If you value what this story gives you, please consider supporting the East London Advertiser. Click the link in the orange box above for details.

Become a supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Latest from the East London Advertiser