Tower Hamlets mayoral campaign: Why Respect’s Abjol Miah backs Lutfur Rahman
“I am giving my wholehearted support to Lutfur Rahman to become the first directly elected executive mayor of Tower Hamlets. This was my position and the position of the Respect Party when Lutfur won the selection contest in the Labour Party by an overwhelming majority. I will support him even more strongly now that he has been entirely unjustly deselected by Labour’s bosses on the National Executive Committee and is standing as an independent.
There are three reasons why Respect originally chose not to stand a candidate against Lutfur but instead to give him our support.
The first is that he has been subject to a terrible witch hunt stained by anti-Muslim racism.
Secondly, Lutfur has a track record as leader of Tower Hamlets council which demonstrated that he understands that some of Labour’s policies in the past have been bad for the majority of the residents of Tower Hamlets and needed changing.
Thirdly, Lutfur has set his face firmly against any cuts to services and jobs in Tower Hamlets which the Condem Coalition intends to inflict on us and has declared he will lead a broad coalition of the trade unions and community groups not only to fight but to stop those cuts.
You may also want to watch:
Everything that has happened in the last few extraordinary days since Lutfur was deselected by Labour has proved he is by far the best candidate with a realistic chance of winning the election. In particular, the revelation of the charges which Helal Abbas presented to the National Executive Committee of the Labour party show both how groundless the charges were and how prejudiced and unjust his deselection was. The Labour bosses’ actions are an insult to the Labour Party members of Tower Hamlets and to the wider electorate.
Amongst the charges against Lutfur is that he met with the Imam of the Grand Mosque at Makah. I would have thought this was something that Lutfur should be praised for as the Imam is a respected religious figure.
- 1 Tyrese Omotoye impresses on O's trial as Ouss Cisse looks set to depart
- 2 Tower Hamlets stages Covid jab festival
- 3 Guilty: Who was jailed across east London in July?
- 4 East London travel disruption round-up for the week ahead
- 5 Vigil for June Harvey one year on from Bow crane tragedy
- 6 From Shoreditch to Las Vegas: New bingo hall for Hackney
- 7 'Vexatious charges': MP turns on accusers after acquittal in fraud trial
- 8 Tube strike suspended to allow for further talks
- 9 Mum plans to use Raine's Foundation site for new East Park church school
- 10 Home Office pours £1m into tackling drug-related problems in East End
Also in the charge sheet is the claim that a number of individuals should not have voted in the selection process because they no longer live in the borough or at the address at which their membership is registered. I have no idea whether this is true and nor does anyone else.
Even more bizarrely none of these allegations now going to be investigated. Nor is there any reason to suppose that Lutfur was the beneficiary of these minor irregularities and they could have had no bearing on the outcome of the selection process because Lutfur won by such a large majority.
If the charges had been so grave that they justified administrative deselection, the candidate who should have been selected in Lutfur’s place was John Biggs. Helal Abbas received less than a third of the votes given to Lutfur by Labour members and less than one sixth of the total votes cast. He came third in the selection process! The charge sheet he brought before Labour’s NEC is a disgrace.
One of the first things I think Ed Miliband needs to do is to launch a proper investigation into Tower Hamlets Labour Party. He needs to get to the truth. Without that the Miliband Labour party will never hope to restore the confidence that has been lost over this disgraceful affair.
As for Helal Abbas, he has never admitted that some of Labour’s policies in the past which he carried out were very damaging to people in Tower Hamlets. Helal Abbas is the “old generation” whereas Ed Miliband and Lutfur Rahman are the “new generation”.
This is very important. I have my disagreements with Ed Miliband and the jury is out on how good a leader he may ultimately be. But there were important things in his maiden speech, as leader, to the Labour Party conference that most people can agree with.
Firstly, Miliband stated what has been obvious to most people and to most Labour Party members - the Iraq War was a mistake that should never have been made. There were alternatives and going to war undermined the United Nations. He might have added that the consequences of this mistake were the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis, hundreds of British soldiers and a massive boost to Al Qaeda and extremist terrorism.
Secondly, he made it clear that Labour had made a massive error in pursuing its free market ideology to the point where deregulation of the banks produced the financial crisis we are now being asked to pay for.
Lutfur also demonstrated in office that he understood the profound housing problems that had been caused by New Labour’s determination not to build council houses but instead to seek to transfer the housing responsibility to the private sector.
There were many things that I disagreed with during Lutfur’s time as council leader but his regime showed a capacity to learn and change that was never there under his predecessors.”