Plans to develop Truman Brewery continue to take shape with one week left to submit objections
- Credit: Archant
Plans to redevelop the Truman Brewery in Spitalfields continue to take shape, with one week left to submit objections.
Old Truman Brewery Limited — the developer — initially submitted their planning statement on February 27, which details the scope of the application.
The proposal includes 6,500 sqm of office space, 2,650 sqm of retail space, 500 sqm of restaurant space and 1,250 sqm of gym space, and runs across three sites; 140 and 146 Brick Lane, and 25 Woodseer Street.
Should permission be granted, a part two, part four-storey office building would be built on 140 Brick Lane, with number 146 on the same street shifting from office to commercial use.
The building on 25 Woodseer Street would be refurbished by performing a two-storey upward extension alongside a side extension.
You may also want to watch:
According to the planning statement, meetings took place with a number of groups ahead of the February submission, including community groups, Woodseer Street residents and ward councillors.
Tower Hamlets Mayor John Biggs has also received a written brief of the plans, for which there was a public exhibition across two days in March last year.
- 1 Cops break Covid-19 rules to have haircuts at Bethnal Green police station
- 2 Murder arrest after woman stabbed to death in Whitechapel this morning
- 3 Lovely Day for Aldgate School picked to sing on Billy Ocean's new single
- 4 Police e-fit expert retiring after 15 years at Bethnal Green
- 5 'Grenfell Tower'-type cladding still not removed from New Providence Wharf after 3 years
- 6 Covid hero who did charity walk in Bow aged 100 now has vaccine
- 7 Fury as family homes vanish when Isle of Dogs landlord converts to bedsits
- 8 Two men arrested after police officers assaulted in Limehouse rave
- 9 Man sentenced after teenage boy groomed on Snapchat to sell heroin
- 10 'Racist consultation' protest rejected on Tower Hamlets street closures as Labour sticks to its manifesto
A number of changes were made to the proposed development in response to the feedback received, which the statement described as “broadly positive”. One of the community groups consulted was The Spitalfields Trust, with pre-submission meetings held in May, September and November 2019 respectively.
The trust has released a statement post-submission, listing a number of outstanding issues with what it considers “an ill-conceived development”.
It reads: “The Truman Brewery development is a short-sighted, poorly and insensitively designed scheme based on an antiquated business model. “Rather than providing much needed housing and affordable workspace, it seeks to introduce buildings inappropriate to the conservation area, which will destroy its appearance and character to the detriment of residents and the local community.”
In response to this statement, a spokesperson for the Old Truman Brewery said: “Our approach to the plans and consultation reaffirms our enduring commitment to the area. The regenerated site will support job creation and the establishment of a number of new businesses.
“We are grateful for feedback from the community, which has helped to shape a scheme that is sensitive to the character of this unique part of Tower Hamlets. We look forward to continued engagement with our neighbours throughout the planning process.”
The developer told the East London Advertiser that it has launched a project website to ensure this engagement.
With the plans now in the hands of the council, all objections are to be sent to senior planner Patrick Harmsworth by June 26.
Beyond likely opposition from the above-mentioned groups, recent correspondence from the greater London archaeological advisory service (GLAAS) may also prove a roadblock to the plans.
According to documents publicly available on the council’s website, archeology advisor Adam Single wrote to Mr Harmsworth on May 19 to outline concerns regarding the lack of archeological assessment included in the application.
In describing the potential development area as one of “archeological interest”, Mr Single stated his “surprise” at this omission.
He added: “If you do not receive more archaeological information before you take a planning decision, I recommend that you include the applicant’s failure to submit that as a reason for refusal.”
The developer said: “We have appointed an archaeological consultant who will be undertaking the archaeological assessment requested by the greater London archaeological advisory service as part of the application.”
On this and all other matters, a spokesman for Tower Hamlets Council offered the following statement: “This application will be considered by the council the usual way.
We will give full consideration to all representations made by residents and local organisations, including on the importance of heritage which is always a key consideration.
It would be inappropriate for us to comment further while the planning process is underway.”
Notably, the development was given the green light by Thames Water on May 27; a positive Health Impact Asssessment (HIA) was also completed in April.
Objections should be sent to Patrick.Harmsworth@towerhamlets.gov.uk by Friday June 26, quoting planning application PA/20/00415/A1.