Tories pledge to rip up Labour council’s propaganda’ weekly
TORY councillors in East London plan to scrap a Labour-controlled local authority’s controversial weekly “propaganda” newspaper if they take over in the May 6 local elections
TORY councillors in East London plan to scrap a Labour-controlled local authority’s controversial weekly “propaganda” newspaper if they take over in the May 6 local elections.
The pledge was made at Tower Hamlets last night to abolish the council tax-subsidised East End Life’ by Opposition group deputy-leader Tim Archer.
“It would be the first act in a complete overhaul of the communications department,” he promised. “East End Life is a total waste of public money.
“We would do away with this propaganda and spending council tax the way residents want.”
The paper is costing the East End’s taxpayers an estimated �1.5 million-a-year in London’s most socially-deprived borough.
Critics are furious that it’s being sent to 90,000 households and business with its political bias favouring Labour party councillors week in, week out. It rarely features Opposition parties, promoting only Labour councillors and candidates.
- 1 Section 60 in place across Tower Hamlets after Stepney stabbing
- 2 'Lucky' escape: Family flees Bethnal Green fire thanks to fire alarms
- 3 Mile End: Car crashes into bus stop during police pursuit
- 4 'A horrific attack': Man suffers critical head injuries from Shoreditch fight
- 5 Jailed: 9 east London offenders put behind bars in April
- 6 Aspire 'will work for everyone in Tower Hamlets' after winning majority
- 7 Night Tube services to return on Jubilee line next week
- 8 Baby boy died from 'whiplash' injuries caused by shaking, trial hears
- 9 Wiley wanted after court no-show amid assault and burglary charges
- 10 12 people charged following east London drugs bust
“There are many ways to communicate with residents,” added Cllr Archer. “The council does not need an expensive weekly promotional paper to do this.”
East End Life’ was also heavily blasted as party propaganda in a Commons debate on January 13 when it was described as “an undemocratic attack on local democracy.”